Creationist claims radiometric dating problems
This is simply another forgery by evolutionists in a desperate attempt to prove Darwin's Theory of Evolution. The genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 seem to infer that sexual dating took place at ages somewhat greater than those of today.
Assigned to a new genus, Sphecomyrma, it showed intermediate features between wasps and ants. And as I said above, I'm also interested to know how much of the fossil-bearing geologic column can be dated by isochrons, and how the dates so obtained compare to others. The Cambrian claim is conventionally assumed to have begun about million years ago.
Even YEC author Danny Faulkner of AIG demonstrated that the heat involved in the eruption phase alone would have been many times beyond lethal to all life on earth. It had been noted that some minerals which yield such dates as beryl, cordierite, etc. If lava intrudes upon geologic period X, then any date for the lava of X or later will not be seen as anomalous. However, no matter where he places it, major problems arise, since every geologic period from Precambrian onward exhibits problem for multiple episodes of slow deposition and non-deposition.
If geological tests are not being applied consistently, one wonders what value they have. In his book, Egypt of the Pharaohs, he wrote of the Old Kingdom: We can also consider the average abundance of argon in the crust.
Meanwhile, more relevant and current sources are often omitted, as illustrated by examples el experimento de miller y urey yahoo dating earlier.
It could be that this argon which is initially loosely bound if it is so initially gradually becomes more tightly bound by random thermal vibrations, until it becomes undetectable by the spectrum technique.